![]() Or even one of the dozens of subscription-based programs. So, sometimes it takes a "complainer" to remind them that they aren't really serving the community they think they are serving.Īny small business big enough to have even a couple of employees can afford the latest Sage version of Peachtree for $400. But sometimes they get so caught up in the minutiae of what they are doing that they lose sight of where the world is going around them. They work for free because they want to help people. Open source authors don't work for free simply because they like to write code all night. Have you seen the code-base for most open-source projects? Or remind the "selfish pleeb" that "open source authors work for free, so take it or leave it." But this isn't productive either. Of course, the common response whenever anyone criticizes an open source project at all is to tell the "complainer" to "just rewrite the code themselves," which is ludicrous. (GAWD, I wish I still had my Peachtree installation files.) GnuCash is truly the only option for many, many people. I've used Peachtree and QuickBooks back when they cost $129 and $69 (one time price) respectively. I am starting to suspect that the only reason GnuCash is popular at all is simply because it is the ONLY program available that isn't subscription-based, isn't web-based, and costs under $400. Allow users to specify which asset and liability accounts show up in which equity sub-accounts. Allow users to specify what happens when a customer invoice is posted or paid. Of course the answer is to not hard-code every operation (other than basic ledger entries) to only work one way. In the issue-tracker where people ask about using GnuCash in cash-basis mode, the authors clearly state that they simply cannot fathom how to make GnuCash work in cash-basis mode. Yet, it does almost nothing to help with payroll, one of the most difficult aspects of running a small business with employees. The second is "small business with employees," which can only ever be run in accrual-mode, thus making it somewhat unsuitable for sole-proprietors, freelancers, and gig-workers, the real-world target market for the program, without ongoing, error-prone, manual workarounds. One is "personal use," for which GnuCash is almost overkill. ![]() But, all the additional features are hard-coded around two very specific use cases. ![]() Yes, it is a double-entry accounting ledger system, and you can make any ledger entry you want. I'm starting to see the serious limitations built into GnuCash.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |